A Growing ‘Posh-Poor Divide’: How Affluence and Deprivation Now Sit Side by Side in Across England.
In Nunsthorpe, residents occupy properties only a few metres from their wealthier neighbours in nearby Scartho. One six-foot-tall wall physically divides the two areas in the town of Grimsby, blocking off roads and walkways that previously connected them.
“This is the divide between rich and poor,” remarked Serenity Colley, aged 37. “It’s been like this since I’ve known. I doubt they’ll bring it down because I don’t think they’ll want to associate with us.”
An Increasingly Common National Picture
Analysis of government statistics reveals how deep inequality can run, sometimes across little more than a few metres of tarmac, a line of hedges or a wall. Decades of budget cuts and underinvestment have led to a situation where a majority of local authorities now contain a neighbourhood classified as one of the most deprived in the nation.
The geographical widening of deprivation has led to a sharp rise in the quantity of locations where deprived and affluent residents end up living side by side. In 2019, just 65 of the poorest neighbourhoods adjoined one of the least deprived. That figure rose to 119 in the latest data.
A Wall That Divides More Than Space
At this Lincolnshire site, the gap is the most pronounced in the country and starkly apparent. The wall is much more than a symbolic divide; it creates tangible difficulties for everyday life.
- School runs that ought to take 15-20 minutes turn into an hour-long detour.
- Access to key amenities like grocery stores, educational facilities and care homes is made more difficult.
- The area often sees vandalism and loitering, with reports of litter being dumped over the wall and related problems.
“People strive to maintain a well-kept home and garden, and then you live opposite that,” said one local, gesturing towards the corroded barricade.
Community Spirit Amidst Hardship
Within a local community centre, workers emphasise that need transcends postcodes. “Your postcode doesn’t necessarily indicate your personal struggles,” said director Tracey Good.
Despite being placed in the lowest 10% for income, employment, education, health and crime, the estate retains a fierce loyalty and sense of community among its inhabitants. By contrast, the neighbouring area is classified among the most prosperous 10% nationally.
A Similar Story: An Estate in Kent
This phenomenon is repeated across the country. The Stanhope area in Ashford, Kent, a 1960s overspill estate, is in the most disadvantaged tenth of areas in England. It is closely bordered by spacious houses built in the early 2000s that sit in the wealthiest tenth for employment and quality of surroundings.
“They might have larger properties, but here there’s a stronger community,” said Phil Hockley, 63. “You’ll probably find a lot of people in the new builds never even talk to each other.”
The economic divide is clear: an typical family home sells for about £275,000 on the estate, while on the other side equivalent homes fetch about £410,000.
Locals describe a tangible feeling of neglect. “This part of the community is neglected,” said holistic health worker Susan. “In this area our facilities have gradually disappeared, and most of the issues we face here are to do with poverty.”
The increase in these ‘inequality borders’ presents a portrait of an ever more divided society, where prosperity and deprivation are often awkwardly in close proximity.