🔗 Share this article

Last year, star Jude Law stated he had no concerns about backlash for playing the Russian leader in a new film. This production, though, could coincide too neatly with the mythologized version circulated by Russian state media that, domestically, it reads as a compliment rather than a critique.

The Crafted Strongman

For years, the Kremlin and its pop-culture machine have collaborated to craft a tailor-made persona of Putin. This character is an infallible strategist devoid of flaws, an ex-intelligence officer reimagined as a local 007 who consistently understands beyond what he shows.

“Domestically, the constructed Putin has long overshadowed the actual person.”

Screen-Based Support

A notable instance is a television show launched last October, directed by a Kremlin supporter. Its main character is a fictional blue-eyed lieutenant colonel selected by fate to “rescue” Russia from disorder. Although the character's name Mikhail, the message is clear: the hero must be a familiar security officer.

International depictions frequently result in buttressing this identical story instead of undercutting it. An adaptation inspired by a bestselling satirical novel sets out to undermine the Putin cult by presenting him as a symptom but as a consequence, shifting the focus to the political machinery surrounding him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

On screen, the president is shown as having been picked by influential figures to steady the country because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. They visit him and all but beg him to become president. His response is that he would rather govern from the shadows, seeking permanent power.

This narrative is the Kremlin’s export myth: the detached, unwilling mastermind guided by fate. Historically, none of this took place.

The Truth Behind the Selection

No one ever begged him to take the job. The presidency was effectively a selection process with no shortage of contenders. At the centre to this process stood an influential oligarch from the Yeltsin era who expected to run the country de facto.

• The shortlist included several politicians, including a reformer later murdered and a security service director.
• According to an expert who researched his rise, the future president simply fitted the necessary criteria: loyal, from the security services, and politically neutral.
• A businessman familiar with the events said the key criterion was manageability and faithfulness, not strength.

“They didn’t need a powerful leader, they needed someone controllable, someone who would obey orders.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Experts agree that the notion of Putin as a powerful KGB spy was constructed retrospectively. Claims about his “recruitment work” in Dresden fall apart under examination. Fundamentally, he handled paperwork and routine duties, a mid-level functionary not involved with field operations.

Curiously, the move to framing him as a “007” could partly have been triggered by Daniel Craig’s arrival as James Bond. The grittier interpretation prompted Russian media and social media to make comparisons with Putin. Mashup posters swapping Craig’s face with his appeared on city centers, feeding the increasing trend to see him as a Russian 007.

A Propaganda Win?

With Jude Law, an star popular with viewers there, the Kremlin will not miss the opportunity to portray this choice as a minor diplomatic triumph. Its exclusion of mass protests, the opposition, or key figures from its narrative, even though it includes the past decade, is a welcome aspect for official messaging.

In Russian cinema, Putin is frequently an all-powerful presence who never appears directly. He is hinted at through portraits or calls “from above”. In this new film, he at last gets a famous actor's visage—one that may inadvertently echo the exact legends it perhaps aims to question.